Sadly, qualifying more or less ran to the script, making it
less exciting than earlier in the year. Vettel got pole, Webber got second and
the McLarens and Ferraris lined up in rows 2 and 3 (Hamilton
heading Button and Alonso leading Massa).
Vergne will be disappointed to join the pointless teams in
failing to leave Q1, perhaps especially as he and his team mate enjoyed a
double points finish in Korea.
However, their qualifying performance there was also not great, so maybe
they'll progress during the race.
Both Force Indias got dropped in Q2, and Schumacher, Senna,
Grosjean and Ricciardo likewise. It was pretty tight from the bottom of the top
10 to those just knocked out, but Schumacher was over half a second behind
Rosberg and Senna was almost as far behind Maldonado.
As mentioned above, the sadly predictable Red Bull front row
lockout happened again, with McLaren getting row 2 and Ferrari row 3. Massa
might've done better, but cocked up the end of an otherwise tasty looking lap.
Despite that, sixth is a good result for him (but also a tricky one. He can't
pull his punches at the start, but being alongside his team mate means he has
to make sure he doesn't get in Alonso's way). Raikkonen may be disappointed to
start just seventh, and is followed by Perez, Maldonado and Rosberg.
Raikkonen revealed afterwards that he buggered up the setup,
which he reckons cost him a place on the second row of the grid. He's a great
driver, but with the three teams flying in formation ahead of him a wonky setup
won't help him much.
Strategy poses an intriguing question, as, before the
weekend, Alguersuari said the circuit was pretty abrasive, yet the drivers
could put in 2-3 good qualifying laps on the soft tyre, and the hard seems
competitive on pace. This suggests a 1 stop strategy could work, although Gary
Anderson, BBC technical chap, reckons in reality the front-runners will go for
a 2 stop.
This matters not just because of the time involved, but also
because of how the cars differ. The Red Bull is not rubbish in a straight line
but it is slower than its chief rivals, but has absolute dominance in the
twisty bit. This means that if the Red Bull is ahead it will pull away, but if
it's behind it'll find passing its adversaries slightly more difficult because
passing in the twisty bit is harder, and whilst passing on the straight is much
easier they lack the pace there. So, a McLaren or Ferrari could better recover
from ending lap 1 in fifth than a Red Bull (probably).
The corners deliberately have wide entry/exit points to
encourage overtaking. This did not happen at all last year because of the large
amount of dust off-line. Whilst that isn't quite the same this year, the track
isn't used much so the racing line will probably still have far more grip than
the rest of the track surface.
So, that means Red Bull need to either go for a 1 stop and
make that stop after its rivals do the first (of a possible two), so that they
remain in the lead, and then manage their tyres, or they need to exactly mirror
what those behind them do (assuming they keep the lead). Well, that's my
theory, anyway.
I can't see much past a Vettel victory, unless he goes for a
1 stop and suffers tyre degradation issues as happened in Korea
(with a smaller gap to the following car). Annoyingly, the McLaren and Ferrari
could be quite competitive in race trim.
The weather, incidentally, is almost certain to be dry and
sunny.
So, from a betting perspective the only relative certainty
is the niceness of the weather. One or two stops could work and the top three
teams might be equally matched on pace.
I considered Grosjean and Hulkenberg for points (partly
because I strongly suspect Maldonado and Rosberg will go backwards) but the
odds were too short. Hamilton for a
victory at 8.8 was tempting. Very tempting, in fact, but McLaren's iffy
reliability and my suspicion that Vettel will be over the hills and far away
within a couple of laps makes me somewhat hesitant to back it. In the end I
decided against tipping it because working out where McLaren is in pace terms
from Korea is
impossible (Hamilton had a broken
rear thingummyjig and Button lasted less than a lap).
I've decided to lay Webber to get a podium at 1.64.
Controversial, but my reasoning is thus: he's not as fast as Vettel, he often
starts a bit poorly (in Japan, where he was the 2 in a Red Bull 1-2, he got
passed immediately off the line) and if Red Bull is equal to others in race
pace I think Hamilton, Alonso, Button and Massa are good enough to pass him.
There's also the real possibility that Red Bull are harder on their tyres than
other teams, which is borne out by Korea and by how easily they switch them on
in qualifying.
No hedging on this tip.
The race starts at the slightly weird time of 9.30am. Hopefully it'll be more entertaining
than the inaugural visit to India
and mark a welcome return to profitability.
Morris Dancer
5 comments:
It's you against me then Morris.
I'm going for Webber to win, you're going for him finishing outside the top three.
That must surely mean that he's certain to finish 2nd or 3rd, meaning that we both lose!
Peter from Putney
Yeah, I did look at a few bets, but given his occasionally weak starts and the possible equality of race pace I think it's just about value.
If he'd been on pole it'd be a different story. Very unlucky for you that he got so close but missed out. Whilst he'd still be long odds (4 or 5, say) for the win having backed him at 13.5 you would've been able to hedge immediately.
And you missed a glorious third option:
Webber leads the race with 2 laps to go by 10s, then suffers a puncture and finishes 9th. Your hedge gets matched, by bet wins, everyone's a winner (except for Webber).
Have laid Vettel to lead the first lap at 1.2 on Betfair.
An effective 5/1 seems reasonable, and if he leads after the first lap the race is probably going to be a snooze anyway.
Well, I wasn't wrong was I?
Still with Button finishing in only 5th place, it was a decidedly ker-ching result for me overall.
Peter from Putney
Post a Comment